Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 25.06.2025 00:40

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
SpaceX launches Sirius XM radio satellite to orbit, lands rocket on ship at sea (photos) - Space
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What’s next?
What are the coolest new smart home gadgets to upgrade your living space?
Just in the last 5 years:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Nintendo Switch 2: The Ars Technica review - Ars Technica
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Russia can stop this any time.
Have you ever secretly watched someone while they were doing something private?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Thank you.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
The View's Sunny Hostin 'Almost Died' After Suffering Allergic Reaction On Air - TooFab
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Is it possible to become homeless after being released from jail or prison in the United States?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Red Sox’ Roman Anthony already has done something Alex Bregman hasn’t - MassLive